Skip to main content
Testnet

Update parameters for staking module

Proposal #16 on Band V3

Overview

Updated

Passed Expedited

Voting ended
Sep 18, 2025
Opened Sep 17, 2025
Submitted
Sep 17, 2025
Sep 17, 12:01 UTC
Deposit
5,000 BAND
Type
Staking parameters

Proposed by band1256qq9eh…wgw84f

Votes

  • Yes 110M BAND
  • No 0 BAND
  • No with veto 0 BAND
  • Abstain 0 BAND

Description

Context

This proposal aims to update the parameters of the staking module.

What it does

The message the chain carries out if it passes, as written in the proposal.

  1. Staking parameters cosmos.staking.v1beta1
    {
        "@type": "/cosmos.staking.v1beta1.MsgUpdateParams",
        "params": {
            "bond_denom": "uband",
            "max_entries": 7,
            "max_validators": 50,
            "unbonding_time": "1814400s",
            "historical_entries": 10000,
            "min_commission_rate": "0.000000000000000000"
        },
        "authority": "band10d07y265gmmuvt4z0w9aw880jnsr700jrdn8wm"
    }

How validators voted

A validator's vote counts for its delegators unless they vote themselves. Largest stake first.

Validator Vote When
validator1 Did not vote —
validator2 Did not vote —
validator3 Did not vote —
validator4 Did not vote —
Active Nodes Did not vote —
B-Harvest Did not vote —
Cosmostation Did not vote —
Nansen Did not vote —
Stakeflow Did not vote —
w3coins Did not vote —
BitNordic Did not vote —
0base.vc Did not vote —
ContributionDAO Did not vote —
HighStakes.ch Did not vote —
Nodes.Guru Did not vote —
StakingCabin Did not vote —
Citadel.one Did not vote —
node101 Did not vote —
Inter Blockchain Services Did not vote —
UbikCapital Did not vote —
Stakecito Did not vote —
CosmosSpaces Did not vote —
Forbole Did not vote —
STAKECRAFT Did not vote —
StakeTown Did not vote —
LithiumDigital Did not vote —
[NODERS] Did not vote —
TTT VN Did not vote —
HashKeyCloudValidator1 Did not vote —
bandvaloper13p2s…4klq Did not vote —

Estimated: voting ended before BitBasic recorded who could vote, so "Did not vote" is from the validators BitBasic reckons were in the active set then.